Russian T95 Tank - Key point: The history of Russian and Soviet armor is full of "supertank" prototypes that promised superior armor and deadly power to any of their contemporaries. But by the end of the Cold War, the Soviet Union had developed a true "supertank" prototype that would have outclassed all modern NATO tanks in this field: the T-95 (Object 195). Russia continued to develop this project until the 2010s, when it was abandoned in favor of the new T-14 "Armata".
But some Russian defense commentators still argue that the T-95 was the best tank. What made it so good? How does this stack up against Armata?
Russian T95 Tank
The Object 195 project was incredibly ambitious. Tank design began in 1988 under the name "Improving-88" project. The idea was to create a tank that would outlast most NATO armor to the same degree that the German Tiger did to Soviet armor when it introduced it.
Battle Modern Tank Stock Photos
This gave the tank a longer effective range, more durability and more damage than previous Soviet tanks.
To ensure better survivability, the designers moved the three crew members into their separate compartments, leaving the turret completely unmanned. Although this design has been adapted for the Armata, the T-95 used it first.
In addition to the redesign of the crew compartment, the T-95 used active protection systems (APS), explosive reactive armor (ERA) and composite armor. The T-95 APS layout was copied directly onto the Armata, with multiple "hard kill" launchers at the bottom of the turret. The T-95 was also fitted with a softkill system, although the exact capability is unknown. The T-95 ERA was an early version of the heavy "Relikt" ERA, which followed the "Kontakt-5". Although common on many modern Russian tanks, the Relikt was originally developed for the T-95.
The T-95's turret was also longer, which allowed it to increase the gun's depression and elevation range. The Soviets had traditionally been willing to sacrifice gun depression for a more curved turret, but changes to the T-95 suggested that designers might move closer to the Western "hull-down" philosophy of placing the crew in the hull.
Russian Tank Hi Res Stock Photography And Images
In terms of armament, the T-95 mounted a 152mm 2A83 smoothbore gun. The gun's stats are nothing short of impressive, with APFSDS ammunition having a muzzle velocity of around 2,000 meters per second. Ammunition was integrated into the 152 mm howitzer, which allowed the tank to fire all types of artillery rounds, including possibly nuclear ones. Guided missiles were also developed for the weapon to provide a longer range.
Similarly, the coaxial armament of the T-95 was increased. Most tanks mount a 7.62mm or 12.7mm machine gun as secondary armament, but the T-95 chooses to mount the 2A42 30mm gun. Coaxial mounting of the vehicle with tank guns has been done before, notably on the French AMX-30 series tanks, but the T-95 autocannon is the largest that can be mounted jointly and has a small range of independent movement.
Of course, a powerful gun is nothing without the ability to hit targets at long distances. The T-95 is equipped with the usual high-zoom thermal and optical sights, but also has a special radar sight directly above the barrel. Radar sights can be used in situations where the battlefield is filled with multispectral smoke that overcomes both optical and thermal vision. The T-14 Armata is assumed to have radar targeting capability, but does not appear to have a dedicated radar gun like the T-95.
The T-95 was also said to have significant battlefield network capability to take advantage of the range of the 152 mm gun. The T-95 was designed to engage targets seen by drones or other units over the horizon.
Russia's Amazing T 95 Tank Should Have Made History
From all the above characteristics, it seems that the T-95 is a much more powerful tank than the T-14. The T-14 has a less powerful primary and coaxial weapon, fewer aiming systems, and similar armor. However, the technology has advanced significantly since the T-95 project was canceled in 2010. The T-14 is said to have extensive jamming capabilities against enemy missiles and radars that exceed the Shtora-2 mounted on the T-95, possibly including chaff and flare launchers.
Charlie Gao studied politics and computer science at Grinnell College and is a regular commentator on defense and national security issues. Why did the T-95 fail? With a powerful main gun and various other advanced systems, the Russian main battle tank "Object 195" project was intended to be a great leap forward in the capabilities of the Russian tank corps. However, the tank, later known as the T-95, was never produced beyond a prototype model, making it part of a large class of Russian weapon systems that its R&D system could not support. Below you will find an analysis of the overall theoretical capabilities of the tank and why Russia passed the T-95. T-95: the legendary Russian tank
While the T-95's capabilities were impressive on paper, it should be noted that most of what we know about the Object 195 comes from technical information that has leaked out of Russia over the years. One of the major attractions of the T-95s was its 152 mm smoothbore main gun, which itself was housed in an automatic turret. This feature, along with the main gun's autoloader, would allow the tank's crew to remain in the hull using the T-95, which would theoretically improve crew survivability. Its explosive armor would have improved that survivability.
Intended to compete with some of the newer US and European tanks, the T-95 included a digital information management system that would inform the crew of ammunition and fuel levels, as well as friendly sharing and receiving of battlefield information. tanks in the district.
T72b3m Russian Main Battle Tank W/kmt8 Mine Clearing System
The tank is also said to have a 1,500 horsepower engine, making it an exceptionally powerful vehicle compared to other Russian tanks of the same period.
Considering how much longer its main gun was compared to similar Russian tanks, the T-95's main gun would give the tank the ability to fight over-the-horizon and urban tank battles with relative ease due to its main gun suppression. The development and demise of the T-95
Development of the T-95 first began in 1988 to create a tank that could defeat the American M1 Abrams tank.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the T-95 was forced to compete with other newly developed Russian tank models such as the T-80UM2 "Black Eagle" for limited research and procurement funds.
Supertest: Fv4201 Chieftain Proto (initial Stats)
Prototype trials first began in 1998 and continued until 2000, when the development of the tank was officially recognized. Moscow stopped further trials of the tank in 2008, and it was later canceled as a project in 2010.
Russian leaders justified the decision to stop development of the T-95 on the grounds that the tank had become obsolete at the end of its long development. T-95 tank becomes T-14 Armata?
However, despite the fact that the T-95 was canceled more than a decade ago, its technological legacy lives on in the Russian military and tank industry.
In fact, many of the innovative technologies developed and developed for the T-95 were recycled and used in Russia's new T-14 Armata tank. In particular, the Armata's remote-controlled main gun has been reworked for use on the Russian T-14.
Russia's T 95 Tank: The Super Weapon Moscow Passed On (a Big Mistake?)
Other T-95 technologies to improve durability were used in the T-14, which, while the T-95 was still under development, was much newer. But like the T-95
The same problem and one of the most characteristic problems of the Russian defense industry is the lack of money for long-term research and development and the serial production of significantly improved models.
The T-95's eventual demise as a project may have been determined by the same technical characteristics that made it look like a strong contender on paper to become Russia's most advanced tank. The development time and financial support required to create such a tank would ultimately prove to be more than the Russian defense industry and military were willing or able to spend on the project, and as a result it was canceled in favor of other modern tank models. Like T-14 and T-90.
Its new Russian military analyst, Wesley Kulp, is a research fellow at the Center for Presidential and Congressional Research. He writes regularly on Russian and Eurasian leadership and national security issues and has contributed to The Hill magazine and the Diplomatic Courier. He can be found on Twitter @WesleyJCulp.
T 14 Armata Mbt Main Battle Tank Technical Data Pictures Video
Wesley Culp is a research associate at the Center for Presidential and Congressional Studies. He writes regularly on Russian and Eurasian leadership and national security issues, and has contributed to The Hill and Diplomatic Courier. He can be found on Twitter @WesleyJCulp. Russian T-95 Tank - 3 Minute History: Russia's T-95 Main Battle Tank May Change
Russian tank helmet, russian tank, american t95 tank, russian t 55 tank, t95 super heavy tank, russian t95, t95 heavy tank, t95 tank model, tank t95, t95 tank wot, t95 tank destroyer, t95 tank russian
0 Comments